Picturing Justice, the On-Line Journal of Law and Popular Culture



Michael Asimow

 

 

Read other reviews:

Internet Movie Database
 
Readers' comments

 

 

LA Law was about law the way it's practiced today--in firms, for dollars. Today, we want our TV lawyers to be realistic. We know that the law is full of shadowy ethical conflicts without simple answers, that the adversary system often conceals the truth and produces injustice, that clients are not all innocent or even decent people, and that practicing law is a tough and very stressful way to make a living. Lawyers on TV (and in real life) often wonder what they hell they are doing with their lives.


Feature article

THE GUILTY PLEASURES OF REUNIONS--LA LAW: THE MOVIE

By Michael Asimow

Ever gone to a high school reunion? There's guilty pleasure in seeing how everyone has aged while you, of course, look just like you did the day you graduated. Or you can revel in how the ones who were most popular and successful in high school have struggled to get by in later life.

Similar pleasures attended the tenth reunion of the law firm of McKenzie, Brackman. Here they were--most of the old cast members of LA Law--together again! Why, it was the very same crowd that spent an hour a week in our living room from 1986 to 1994 (before the show fizzled out amid a departure of key cast members and an epidemic of weak scripts). And now we find out what's happened to each of them in the ensuing ten years. This was the show that was a ratings sensation in its early years and attracted hordes of money-hungry applicants to the law schools.

How wonderful to see these old friends again! Leland McKenzie has retired and is clipping roses in Montecito but Douglas Brackman is still managing partner. Indeed, Douglas' son is now an associate with the firm, but he doesn't exactly share Douglas' bottom-line approach to law. Michael Kuzak has left the firm and now runs a successful bar (Michael gave up the law after a client for whom he had won an acquittal raped and killed a new victim). Arnie Becker--yes, good old Arnie--is going through a divorce from his much younger wife. Stuart Markowitz and Ann Kelsey--who are still married and have a kid at Crossroads School--have opened their hearts (and their checking account) to their guru. Benny Stulwicz --still there, fetching Starbucks and Krispy Kremes for the staff. Roxanne, now the office manager, is still having problems with her dorky ex, Dave. Grace Van Owen has become Los Angeles DA and is as tough and tight-lipped as ever. And so on.

But wait--they look so much older than when we saw them last! Roxanne has put on a lot of weight and Arnie has lost his hair. He's just not the hunk he used to be. Douglas and Leland look much older. Grace, Stuart and Ann are aging, too. Michael Kuzak looks terrific.

The reunion movie wasn't one of the best LA Laws (at least as I recall them) but it wasn't bad either. I thought the energy level was quite a bit lower than the way I remembered it. The main story involved Kuzak's coming out of retirement to handle a stay of execution for a client he had represented years ago. Entertainingly, but implausibly, Kuzak manages to establish that the client was framed; he walks out of the courtroom a free man. Grace is defeated again! (But will former lovers Michael and Grace get together again??) Stuart and Anne are ripped off by their guru. Arnie discovers his wife (from whom he is separated) in bed with another man and declares war. He's going to fight the divorce to the bitter end, demand all of the property, seek custody of the dogs (whom he detests).

Abby Perkins (who now has her own law firm) emerges to represent Arnie's wife--and shows up with eight forensic accountants to audit McKenzie, Brackman and establish the value of Arnie's interest in the firm. Dave contacts Roxanne and announces that he has cancer and has only a few weeks left; can she shelter him in his last days? (Or is he still just the old scam artist?) A new female associate is on the make for Ann's client and Arnie's body. So there is an abundance of thematic material in the reunion show. It is somewhat like Bartok's Concerto for Orchestra--everybody gets to play a solo.
So how come we have such fond memories for this TV show that was really part law story, part soap opera? Watching the reunion show brought back some of the reasons.

First, LA Law opened the way for the type of law shows on TV that we now take for granted. Prior to LA Law, lawyers on TV were solo practitioners, often in the painfully formulaic Perry Mason or Matlock mode. Like The Defenders from the 1960's, none of the TV lawyers ever appeared to care about money and none ever had an ethical problem. LA Law was about law the way it's practiced today--in firms, for dollars. Today, we want our TV lawyers to be realistic. We know that the law is full of shadowy ethical conflicts without simple answers, that the adversary system often conceals the truth and produces injustice, that clients are not all innocent or even decent people, and that practicing law is a tough and very stressful way to make a living. Lawyers on TV (and in real life) often wonder what they hell they are doing with their lives. We would never have The Practice or Law & Order if LA Law had not gone first.

Second, LA Law did a great job in probing the business v. profession conflict that is at the root of the problems of law practice today. Is law just another profit-making business--no different from selling advertising or sweaters--or is it still a "profession"? Should you extract every possible dollar from every client by overbilling or charging $2 per page for sending or receiving faxes? Or do the old ideas of professionalism still hold, such as putting the client's interest before the lawyer's, maintaining some independence from clients, or recognizing the obligation to do pro bono work? This is the era of mega-firms, soaring associate salaries, seven-figure profit shares, 2400 billable hours a year, disappearing civility, and brutal competition among lawyers and within law firms. In this Darwinian world, the business model holds sway and the professional model has nearly collapsed. .

On LA Law, we saw the business/profession battle being fought out within the partnership every week. Brackman was always bottom line; all that counted were billable hours, collecting fees, avoiding clients who couldn't pay. Arnie Becker was always interested in pumping up the hours and turning friendly divorces into lucrative vendettas. Before her untimely demise, Rosalind Shays carried the profit incentive to the max. On the other hand, McKenzie often stuck up for the professional model, aided by Michael Kuzak and Ann Kelsey.

This old struggle played out well in the reunion show. Kuzak wanted to represent his former client in the death penalty hearing but he needed backup from the firm. Brackman wouldn't hear of it. After all, Kuzak hasn't worked there for years, the firm doesn't do criminal law (at least not that kind of criminal law), and this client can't pay a nickel. Kuzak goes to the retired McKenzie for support and also gets enthusiastic backing from Markowitz and Brackman's son. Well, folks, Douglas Brackman is the way law is practiced today. It's pretty much all bottom line. Pro bono and all that soft stuff is shoved aside.

Third, LA Law was the first of the law shows to deal with the personal life of its characters, as The Practice continues to do. Perry Mason and The Defenders apparently had no lives outside the office (Law & Order maintains this tradition). But the lawyers of LA Law were all too human. Just because they were great lawyers did not make them great human beings or give them good judgment about their lives. Indeed, their personal lives were mostly a shambles. And so it is in real life too. Many lawyers today have no time for a personal life, much less a life-style, and don't know how to spend all that money (once they've paid back their six-figure student loans). The rates of alcoholism and drug abuse among lawyers are far higher than in the general population.

In the reunion show, we see smart lawyers acting like personal idiots. Take a tax lawyer like Stuart Markowitz--he'd watch out for a client's every nickel. Yet Stuart and Ann give their guru the power to draw from their checking account for his new building project! Arnie Becker, who knows better than anyone how utterly destructive a nasty divorce can be, decides that he's going to be as vindictive in his own divorce as any of his clients ever were. Real lawyers can be just as stupid and self-destructive in their personal lives as the characters in this show.

So it was with nostalgic feelings and guilty delight that this aging LA Law fan welcomed his aging friends from McKenzie, Brackman back into his living room. Who knows? Maybe we'll all see each again at the twentieth reunion.

Posted: May 21, 2002

Would you like to comment on this article? Please submit your comments here.

 Top of page

 Home | Silver Screen | Small Screen | News & Views