Picturing Justice, the On-Line Journal of Law and Popular Culture



Judge J. Howard Sundermann, Jr.

First Appellate District of Ohio

 

Read other reviews:


Internet Movie Database

All Movie Guide

Readers' comments
 

 

The usually reliable Julian Moore, who is good in dramatic roles, is miscast and seems ill suited to comedy. She plays an uptight attorney and seems none too bright for someone who is introduced as having finished first in her class at Yale


Feature article

LAWS OF ATTRACTION

by Judge J. Howard Sundermann

There are so many good legal films made, why does it seem impossible to make a good one about domestic relations lawyers? The recent Intolerable Cruelty was a disaster and Laws of Attraction is no better. Kramer v. Kramer was an excellent film but it was really more about the relationship between the father and his son than about the attorneys and legal issues in the case.

Laws of Attraction is the classic Hollywood romantic comedy formula, where two people seem to hate each other at the beginning of the movie, but slowly discover that they are in love by the end of the film. It seems to be modeled loosely on the old film Adam's Rib with Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn, but is not nearly as good.

In Laws of Attraction the two main characters are both divorce lawyers on opposite sides of various cases. Pierce Brosnan as Daniel Rafferty is raffish and relaxed and never seems to have his tie on properly. He does his part reasonably well given this script. But the usually reliable Julian Moore, who is good in dramatic roles, is miscast and seems ill suited to comedy. She plays an uptight attorney and seems none too bright for someone who is introduced as having finished first in her class at Yale. She seems closer to Elle Woods in Legally Blonde than the Hepburn character in Adam's Rib.

The plot is that these seemingly ill matched people oppose each other in court, but at some point go out together and get totally drunk. In the morning they wake up and find that they are married. They are presented as getting along well for a while, but then a small incident persuades the Moore character that she wants to get a divorce of their own.

The filmmaker try's to spice up an otherwise dull screenplay with locations and side characters. For some unexplained reason, Brosnan, the top-notch divorce lawyer in New York, has his office over a Chinese restaurant in China Town. The two also make a trip to a castle in Ireland, but neither location helps much. One side character is good, Francis Fisher as Moore's mother. She is a vain ex-beauty who when asked if she is really fifty six years old replies, "Parts of me are." The two primary divorce clients, one a rock star and the other a dress designer, are just annoying.

There is not much here, save your eight dollars for the summer blockbusters.


Posted May 11, 2004

Would you like to comment on this article? Please submit your comments here.

 Top of page

 Home | Silver Screen | Small Screen | News & Views