Picturing Justice, the On-Line Journal of Law and Popular Culture




Christine Corcos

 

Read other reviews:

Official site
Internet Movie Database
All Movie Guide
 

 

Like so many law series, A.U.S.A. sacrifices opportunities to talk seriously yet amusingly about the law for cheap laughs at the profession's expense. Instead of using the financial plight of the retired to make some memorable points about how our society treats its elderly and its veterans, it insults both those victims and its audience, especially with its use of slapstick humor.


Feature article

A.U.S.A.: Another Useless Stereotyped Attorney

by Christine Alice Corcos

NBC has launched its newest legal show, A.U.S.A. (short for Assistant United States Attorneys), a sitcom about newly minted federal prosecutors in New York City, although it seems to be primarily a vehicle for the star, Scott Foley, perhaps a starring role payoff for his secondary role on the long running Felicity. A.U.S.A. recycles every stereotype we've seen in the past five years or longer of legal dramas and comedies, reaching back to Life's Work for the clumsy, clueless protagonist (although Scott Foley as Adam Sullivan is still a smarter and more competent lawyer than Lisa Ann Walter as Lisa Ann Hunter, which isn't saying much), Ally McBeal for the bathroom events, and Night Court for the hostile top dog prosecutor (Peter Jacobson's Geoffrey Lawrence though equally ambitious is clearly a more savvy attorney than John LaRoquette's Dan Fielding). We don't see much of Sullivan's colleague Ana Rivera (Ana Ortiz) as the savvy former cop turned prosecutor in the first episode, but the back story suggests that she is more competent and more street smart than Adam. In addition, the laugh track is annoying and intrusive, and it accompanies lines and actions that don't always merit guffaws. We do escape one frequent cliché in the pilot, however. Amanda Detmer as the public defender Susan Rakoff is smart, compassionate and competent. That won't last long. According to received television wisdom, able female attorneys are not funny.

Nor is the pilot episode, which aired Tuesday night after Frasier, particularly hilarious and NBC spoils its attraction by showing the best bits in its promos. Sullivan injures himself while learning to fire an AK47 (which annoys the ATF guy in charge of teaching him). He gets water on his pants and tries to dry them with the hand dryer while using the judges' bathroom (which annoys them, particularly the one hearing his case). He shows up late on his first day at a job that he claims he has "busted his ass for" for six years, a tardiness which annoys his new boss and the boss' cranky secretary. Think she's cranky because she spends so much time with lawyers? I think she's cranky because she's trapped in this sitcom.

In a really bad career move, Adam makes a date with one of the jurors in his boss's case. To be fair, it isn't entirely his fault. His roommate introduced them at the courthouse. By contrast with the roommate, Sullivan is a brilliant guy. Why these two are friends is complete mystery. Sullivan eventually shows some compassion and some political smarts by deciding to drop the prosecution of a Tuskegee Airman charged with cashing his dead wife's Social Security checks in order to pay for her funeral. He also tries to explain jury tampering to his buddy, which is a futile maneuver. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

By making the date mentioned above with the juror, Sullivan becomes the reason for a mistrial. His new boss is furious, but the laugh track encourages us to giggle uncontrollably. The boss must be able to hear us. He forgives Adam and gives him his first case-the prosecution of this retired soldier and war hero. The war hero appears in court and before Sullivan can begin his case, tells the judge he is ready to plead guilty. Then Rakoff gives the court a rundown of his accomplishments. She and her client look good. Sullivan looks bad. The judge (from the bathroom incident) looks annoyed and disgusted. Sullivan leaves the courtroom in disarray. He discusses the case with his incompetent paralegal, Wally (John Ross Bowie). He decides to dismiss the charges, though his boss doesn't like the idea. He returns to court, only to discover that the defendant was injured in the courthouse tackling a thief and is now in the hospital recuperating from a broken hip. Sullivan visits him and is unfunnily and unceremoniously escorted out by two of the defendant's Tuskegee colleagues, both in their late seventies. Their dignity saves the scene from being hopelessly trite but Sullivan looks pathetic.

A comedy about lawyers could be very amusing. This show's pedigree should have ensured that it is. Its creator, Rich Appel, was a federal prosecutor before he turned to writing, and he has written some good material, especially for The Simpsons. Scott Foley, who starred in Felicity, is a good actor. His colleagues make up a capable ensemble. But the characters don't really come together. A.U.S.A. doesn't seem destined to be an ensemble show, like its lead-in Frasier. Its jokes are stale, and delivered with absolutely no style. What magnifies its faults further is that the network gave the show's creators some extra time to redo things which it asked that instead of filming the series with a single camera, they reshoot using multiple cameras. The additional time should have cued Appel and his associates to rethink some other aspects of the show.

Like so many law series, A.U.S.A. sacrifices opportunities to talk seriously yet amusingly about the law for cheap laughs at the profession's expense. Instead of using the financial plight of the retired to make some memorable points about how our society treats its elderly and its veterans, it insults both those victims and its audience, especially with its use of slapstick humor. The elderly, the disabled and veterans who can't make ends meet on their Social Security is not a funny subject, you object? Absolutely true, but I didn't choose the topic.

More than this I cannot say; the show doesn't offer much more, at least not yet. I had planned to try to catch the second episode, but missed it, and have lost any enthusiasm for watching the third. I am very disappointed in this new series. I was ready for a clever, smart, pointed legal satire. My verdict: unless it develops a likeable and distinct personality and some new approaches, A.U.S.A. will disappear quickly from NBC's lineup, to be replaced by some other lightweight and equally forgettable series.

Posted February 20, 2003

Would you like to comment on this article? Please submit your comments here.

 Top of page

 Home | Silver Screen | Small Screen | News & Views