Picturing Justice, the On-Line Journal of Law and Popular Culture


Paul Bergman
is Professor of Law, UCLA Law School. He is co-author of Reel Justice: The Courtroom Goes to the Movies (1996) and wrote "Redemptive Lawyering", in the forthcoming UCLA Law Review symposium on law and popular culture.

 

Read other reviews:

Michael Asimow
Taunya Lovell Banks
Judith F. Daar

Lev Ginsburg
Official site

Internet Movie Database
All Movie Guide 
Readers' comments

 

Watching capable lawyers battle over a public policy issue as important as cloning was refreshing in an era when lawyer shows tend to resemble either soap operas or paperback mysteries. At the same time, I wanted to know much more about the legal ramifications of cloning than Century City told me.


Feature article

A "DEFENDERS" FOR THE 21ST CENTURY?

By Paul Bergman


In a companion essay on the new TV lawyer drama, Century City, Michael Asimow likens the show to L. A. Law. However, the March 2004 premiere episode suggests that with a bit of watering, Century City's roots can stretch all the way back to The Defenders. Like that classic TV show that ran from 1961-1965, Century City seems interested in working through the legal ramifications of important social issues. If the show is willing to trust its audience to care about those issues at least as much as it does the sex lives of the lawyers of the law firm of Crane, Constable, McNeil & Montero, the show may run long enough for some of its associates to become partners.

In the initial episode, idealistic new associate Lukas Gold persuades the firm to represent a father charged with illegally bringing a cloned embryo of his son into the country. The son has a fatal liver disease, and the father can save his son's life by taking the clone's liver and transplanting it into his son. (The show is set futuristically in 2030, a time when cloning-on-demand may be technologically possible but not yet legally acceptable.) The father admits that he committed a crime, but asks Lukas and the firm to free the seized clone so he can go forward with the transplant.

Watching capable lawyers battle over a public policy issue as important as cloning was refreshing in an era when lawyer shows tend to resemble either soap operas or paperback mysteries. At the same time, I wanted to know much more about the legal ramifications of cloning than Century City told me. For example, if the father admittedly committed a crime by attempting to bring the clone into the country, on what basis can he get it back? After all, a person caught trying to transport illegal drugs across the border doesn't get the drugs back. Century City pays lip service to this issue, but the explanation was not very satisfactory. Equally unsatisfactory is Lukas' argument that while it may be OK for the government to prevent cloning, the father should get this clone back because the cloning already took place. The power of legal dramas is their ability to personalize and therefore make viewers care about otherwise abstract legal issues. They can use this power both to educate and entertain, but only if they develop competing legal arguments in more depth than I saw in Century City's opening episode.

Thus, Century City does indeed have promise. For me, that promise will be fulfilled only if the show is willing to trust to its viewers' intelligence, roll up its sleeves and really grapple with legal issues. If it can accomplish that, the only disappointed members of the viewing audience may be today's law students. They'll see that law firm life in 2030 is as pressurized and demanding of one's time as it is here in 2004.


Posted April 1, 2004

Would you like to comment on this article? Please submit your comments here.

 Top of page

 Home | Silver Screen | Small Screen | News & Views