Picturing Justice, the On-Line Journal of Law and Popular Culture



Judge J. Howard Sundermann, Jr.
First Appellate District of Ohio

 

Read other reviews:

Paul Joseph
Michael Asimow

Christine Corcos
Taunya Lovell Banks
Lev Ginsburg

 The Court homepage
Readers' comments

 


The clerks are portrayed as having far too large an effect on the outcome of the cases. They are also portrayed as being in full-time competition with each other and they are constantly gloating when they think a Justice has adopted their position over that of another clerk
.


Feature article

THE COURT

by Judge J. Howard Sundermann


The success of the television series The West Wing, the alleged inside look at the White House, has spawned similar inside look shows of another branch of government, the Supreme Court. ABC's entry is called The Court. Like First Monday, another television show about the Supreme Court, the premise is that a new Justice is coming on a court that is in a four to four deadlock.

The problem for this type of show is that the inside workings of an appellate court are not as intrinsically exciting as the White House. Trust me on this one. To really portray an accurate picture of the court, the program would show judges simply sitting at their desks reading and writing. Of course, The Court producers have tried to spice it up, and the producer of West Wing has been enlisted to do just that.

Sally Field plays the lead character, a former governor of Ohio. She is nominated as a justice because she is a moderate with no previous appellate experience, no "paper trail," and is easy to confirm. The first show dealt largely with her selection and confirmation process. Sally Field is likeable in film and comes across as a likeable character here, but also politically savvy. Her career has come full circle from when she first wore a robe as the Flying Nun.

It is evident, after the first show, that there is a sub-plot brewing as we are introduced to a young reporter, a former student of the new Justice, who is trying to dig up dirt on his former teacher. There are hints he may be on to something but there is not enough proof yet. He finds the beginnings of a story in Ohio that has some relation to, what else, a strip club.

A parallel story along with that of the Justices is about the law clerks. They seem to be the same clerks from First Monday. The clerks are young and good-looking, clearly aiming for a young audience. But in order to feature the clerks so prominently, considerable accuracy is sacrificed. The clerks are portrayed as having far too large an effect on the outcome of the cases. They are also portrayed as being in full-time competition with each other and they are constantly gloating when they think a Justice has adopted their position over that of another clerk. In reality, appellate clerks are congenial to each other and deferential to the Judges. The only time they might really be in competition is for good jobs after their tenure on the court.

The Court is well made with a likeable star and it is better than its competitor First Monday, but I predict the show will not be a success. Each show will probably treat a different current issue in a cursory way and I am already tired of the bickering law clerks.

Posted April 3, 2002

Would you like to comment on this article? Please submit your comments here.

 Top of page

 Home | Silver Screen | Small Screen | News & Views